 |
| ||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||
  Cuddl Duds Softwear Long John - p25780 By: Cuddl Duds Average Rating: 3.5 Total Reviews: 9 More Information Comfortable and warm  On: 2010-01-03These winter undergarments are both light weight and warm. They fit under pants (including dress pants) discreetly. Did not receive product on time  On: 2009-02-16I was disappointed with the whole process of ordering. Amazon said my product would come within 7 days, which would have worked out perfectly as I needed the Cuddl Duds for my trip. The day before I left for my trip I received a shipment notification/receipt that I would receive my item in 7-10 days. So I had to go out and find some Cuddl Duds (not a big deal but when I had limited time to begin with, it was again irritating) which ended up being MUCH cheaper. It ended up being a win situation for me, but I did lose some time. I will think twice before ordering from Amazon in a time-crunch. A Complete Dud! On: 2009-02-03WAY too short (practically capri length), WAY too baggy in the legs, WAY WAY too tight around the waist . . hey, theyre a 2X for cryin out loud! You know . . for a less-than-svelte woman. They mustve gotten the elastic they used for the waistband mixed up with the scrap they use for an Extra Small!! I spent $25 having them altered - a larger, more COMFORTABLE 3" stretch elastic waistband put in, the legs tapered from inseam to hem and 3" stretch elastic sewn around the bottoms so they wouldnt pop out of my socks every time I sat down - ON TOP OF the $26 I spent for the "Duds" themselves. Good money after bad! Dont waste a penny of yours on this product. soft and warm On: 2008-12-10The outside of these are silky and go easily under jeans and slacks without bulk like some other brands and styles. Despite being extremely warm in cold weather they do not make you too warm when inside. I just love these things! Comfy and thin but rather baggy  On: 2007-12-22The fabric is smooth, and theyre warm (OK under jeans for outdoor temps down to 20F/-7C or so) but thin so that my legs dont feel hot when wearing them indoors. My only complaint is that even "small" size has very long legs and is baggy on me (Im 53", 105lbs or 160cm, 48kg). Younger women like me and teenage girls also may not like the old-lady high waist peeking out of their pants. Cuddl Duds On: 2007-05-14As always, the finest quality underwear. Not only do I wear it as another layer in the winter, it makes the best pajamas Ive ever found. Soft, not durable  On: 2006-02-23These are very soft, warm, and comfortable long underwear pants, but after only 2 or 3 washings they have come apart at one seam. For the price, Id expect them to last much, much longer. I wont buy this brand again, simply because of the durability issue. Soft, not durable On: 2006-02-22These are very soft, warm, and comfortable long underwear pants, but after only 2 or 3 washings they have come apart at one seam. For the price, Id expect them to last much, much longer. I wont buy this brand again, simply because of the durability issue. Creme de La Creme by: Anonymous On: 2003-01-25 These pants are so comfortable and are exactly what is needed for cold winter days! |